SmartAdvisorOnline logo SmartAdvisorOnline PROXY • VPN • Privacy
Updated: 2026-02-06
VPN for developers: CLI-first WireGuard, split tunnelling, MTU optimisation and secure SSH/Git workflows
Home Blog VPN for Developers

VPN for Developers: CLI-First Setups for SSH, Git, Docker & Cloud

By Published: Updated:

Developers are sceptical by default — and for good reason. This guide is built around what actually breaks in real workflows: SSH sessions that stall, Git pushes that hang, Docker pulls that get weird, and corporate networks that block UDP. You’ll get a workflow-based configurator, CLI commands, MTU optimisation, and latency-focused protocol comparisons.

Disclosure: Some links are affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Quick Answer
Key takeaway: Developers don’t need “a VPN app” — they need a reliable network tunnel that keeps SSH stable, doesn’t break Docker pulls, and keeps Git operations predictable. Start with WireGuard for low latency, add a kill switch, then apply split tunnelling so your local subnets and internal services remain reachable.
  • Best default: WireGuard (kernel-level) + kill switch + DNS leak protection.
  • When networks block VPNs: use OpenVPN over TCP 443 (TLS/HTTPS camouflage).
  • When “Git push hangs at 90%”: test and tune MTU before blaming the VPN.
Verdict (Denys Shchur): “A developer doesn't need a VPN; they need a reliable network tunnel that doesn't break their environment. We aren't selling a privacy shield — we are providing a network optimisation manual for professionals who value their uptime and their Git history.”

The DevStack VPN Configurator (choose your workflow)

Pick your workflow and I’ll suggest a practical VPN stack (protocol + features) with copy/paste commands. This is opinionated on purpose: it prioritises stable SSH, predictable routing, and low-latency developer tooling.

Tip: set the local subnet to keep LAN dev servers reachable (NAS, routers, Docker hosts).

Android app vs extension vs manual? Developers have a different “triple threat”

For developers, the real comparison is protocol + routing control + automation. The table below is the practical view: what protects your whole device, what gives the lowest latency, and what is easiest to script.

The developer’s comparison: WireGuard vs OpenVPN vs IKEv2/L2TP (manual)
Method Full-device protection Latency & handshake Automation Where it shines
WireGuard Yes Lowest latency; very fast handshake Excellent (wg-quick, systemd, scripts) SSH, Git, Docker pulls, Kubernetes access
OpenVPN (UDP) Yes Higher latency; slower handshake Good (cli + config) Compatibility, mature tooling, corporate networks
OpenVPN (TCP 443) Yes More overhead; can feel “sticky” Good Bypassing strict firewalls (TLS/HTTPS disguise)
IKEv2 Yes Fast reconnects; decent latency Medium Mobile-ish usage and quick roaming
L2TP/IPsec Yes Older; variable performance Medium Legacy environments (only if you must)

CLI-first: no-GUI VPN management

If you live in terminals, you’ll want your VPN to behave like any other service: start, stop, status, logs. Below is a minimal cheat sheet that works across common setups.

CLI commands: connect, disconnect, verify, and troubleshoot
Task Linux macOS Windows
Bring WireGuard up sudo wg-quick up wg0 sudo wg-quick up wg0 (or use WireGuard app CLI) WireGuard app (or service), plus scripted routes
Bring WireGuard down sudo wg-quick down wg0 sudo wg-quick down wg0 Disconnect in app / scheduled task
Check status sudo wg or ip a ifconfig / netstat -rn Get-NetIPConfiguration (PowerShell)
Verify public IP curl ifconfig.me (or curl https://api.ipify.org)
DNS sanity check resolvectl status / dig whoami.cloudflare scutil --dns / dig +short whoami.cloudflare ipconfig /all / nslookup
Expert tip: Automate your VPN. Trigger it only when you start Docker containers or an SSH session: connect → run your workflow → disconnect. You’ll reduce exposure and keep your routing predictable.
Play: SmartAdvisorOnline — VPN video
Play video

Prefer YouTube directly? Open the video.

The MTU & latency optimisation guide (fix SSH stalls and “Git push 90%”)

MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) problems often look like “random” timeouts: SSH sessions that freeze, HTTP requests that hang, or Git pushes that stall near the end. It’s usually fragmentation in the path — and VPN adds overhead.

Client packet (1500 bytes) VPN adds overhead (headers + encryption) Path MTU too small → fragmentation / drops → stalls & retries Fix: lower the VPN interface MTU (e.g. 1420) until packets pass without fragmentation and SSH/Git become stable again.
MTU troubleshooting checklist (practical)
Symptom Likely cause What to do
SSH freezes after connect Path MTU too small through VPN Lower interface MTU; test with pings (don’t guess)
Git push stalls near the end Large packets dropped / retransmits Find safe MTU; prefer WireGuard; keep TCP 443 only for bypassing blocks
Docker pulls are slow or inconsistent DNS latency or TCP over TCP issues Use UDP protocols; verify DNS resolver and cache behaviour
Only some sites work Split DNS / MTU / routing conflicts Check routes + DNS; confirm your VPN uses one resolver path

How to find a safe MTU (step-by-step)

You can discover a working MTU by sending “do not fragment” pings and lowering the payload until it succeeds. The exact flags differ by OS, but the concept is the same: find the largest packet that survives the path.

Linux example: Start with ping -M do -s 1472 1.1.1.1. If it fails, lower -s until it passes, then add overhead margin. A common WireGuard MTU is around 1420, but measure for your path.

Git & SSH security (and how not to lose local access)

A VPN reduces the chance of interception on hostile Wi‑Fi and makes your traffic harder to profile. The practical win for developers: fewer opportunities for man‑in‑the‑middle attempts against SSH, Git credentials, and package managers. But you still need sane routing: keep access to your local subnets and internal endpoints.

Laptop Docker / SSH / Git VPN tunnel (wg0) Default route: Internet Kill switch enabled Internet APIs, repos Split tunnelling: exclude 192.168.0.0/16 → keep LAN servers reachable
Local network exclusions: common patterns and why they matter
Use case Exclude Why
Home/office LAN 192.168.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/8 Keep access to NAS, routers, printers, internal test servers
Kubernetes / private VPC ranges Specific subnets used by your cloud/VPC Avoid accidental routing of private traffic through VPN exit
Local Docker networks Docker bridge ranges (varies) Prevent weird DNS/routing conflicts while building images

Protocol latency benchmarks (what devs actually feel)

Download speed is not your main metric. Developers feel latency: SSH responsiveness, API round trips, and Git fetch/push time. WireGuard usually wins because it is lightweight, runs efficiently, and avoids a heavy TLS handshake.

Latency and handshake: realistic expectations (relative)
Protocol Typical latency impact Handshake speed Why it behaves that way
WireGuard (UDP) Low Very fast Lean crypto, minimal overhead, efficient keepalives
OpenVPN (UDP) Medium Slower TLS + user-space overhead, heavier control channel
OpenVPN (TCP 443) Medium–High Slower TCP-over-TCP can amplify congestion and retries
IKEv2 Low–Medium Fast reconnect Good roaming; solid in many stacks

The developer’s toolkit (verify the environment)

Treat your VPN like infrastructure. Verify DNS, routes, and jitter before you assume “the VPN is slow”. These tools are lightweight and work everywhere.

  • mtr — combined ping + traceroute to spot jitter and packet loss.
  • dig — inspect resolvers and test DNS behaviour.
  • tcpdump — confirm which interface actually carries traffic.
  • curl — verify IP, headers, and routing quickly from scripts.
If your work involves scraping or anti-bot testing, remember: changing an IP isn’t enough. A VPN handles the network layer, while a stealth browser handles DOM/Canvas/fingerprint surfaces. That’s why browser-based test rigs can still be flagged even when the IP changes.
Network layer (IP/DNS/Routes) → handled by VPN (WireGuard/OpenVPN) Browser layer (DOM/Canvas/WebGL/Fonts) → handled by stealth/fingerprint tooling Anti-bot systems correlate both layers → testing needs both IP control and fingerprint control

When corporate networks block VPNs (TLS stealth on TCP 443)

Some office Wi‑Fi setups block UDP or known VPN signatures. In those cases, OpenVPN over TCP 443 can blend into standard HTTPS traffic. It’s not the fastest option, but it’s often the most reliable way to get a tunnel when you’re behind strict filters.

Rule of thumb: use WireGuard by default. Switch to TCP 443 only when the network forces you to. Then prioritise optimisation: keep the tunnel stable, reduce MTU issues, and avoid double-NAT surprises.

FAQ (developer edition)

Why does my SSH time out when I turn the VPN on?
The most common causes are MTU/fragmentation issues and route conflicts. Lower the VPN MTU (or discover it with “do not fragment” pings), then confirm routes to your targets.
Is WireGuard always better than OpenVPN for latency?
Typically yes, especially for interactive workflows (SSH, API calls), because WireGuard’s handshake and overhead are lighter. However, OpenVPN on TCP 443 can be the only viable option on restrictive networks.
How do I keep access to my local network while using a VPN?
Use split tunnelling (route exclusions) for private subnets such as 192.168.0.0/16 and 10.0.0.0/8. This keeps LAN services reachable while internet traffic goes through the tunnel.
What’s the best VPN setup for web scraping?
Prefer WireGuard for performance, add a kill switch and DNS leak protection, and consider rotating exit IPs. Remember that anti-bot systems also fingerprint the browser layer — an IP change alone may not be enough.